|| News Blog | Energy News | Revised Oil Pollution Act Case Digest and Source Book ||
Legal Watch: Volume 8
Prepared by William H. BodeCase Summary: The Port O'Connor terminal on the Intercoastal Canal was leased first in 1969 under a 5-year, renewable lease. The lease was renewed four times, when in 1994 the fifth and final lease extension was made by Coastwide Marine Services. Thereafter, Tesoro Marine Services acquired Coastwide Marine and vacated the terminal site in 2001 when the lease expired. The Lessor then claimed that Tesoro had breached the lease by failing to return the premises "in as good condition and state of repair, reasonable wear and tear expected," as required by the lease. After a trial, a Texas judge ordered Tesoro to pay the Lessor $260,000, mainly to repair the bulkhead at the terminal, plus interest and attorney fees. On appeal, Tesoro contended that the baseline date for determining the condition of the facility should have been 1994, when the final lease extension by Coastwide Marine occurred, and not back to 1969. Tesoro also argued that the Lessor's expert testimony on damages was unreliable. The appeals Court rejected both positions. The Court reasoned that what date is used was without consequence: if the lease were terminated in 1994, the premises would have to be in the same condition (less normal wear and tear) as they had been in 1969. The Court also ruled that the expert's testimony on the need to shore-up the bulkhead was admissible because even a lay person could understand that soil washout behind the bulkhead could dangerously weaken the structure.
Bode & Grenier, LLP
1150 Connecticut Ave., NW
Washington, D.C. 20036
Telephone: 202-862-4300 | Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
TESORO ORDERED TO PAY FOR REPAIRS AT TERMINAL WHEN LEASE EXPIRED
LESSON: Lease renewals can have long tails. Leasees should be aware that they could be required to return leased premises to its original condition decades later. (Tesoro Marine Services Inc. v. Bagby)
$5 MILLION IN PUNITIVE DAMAGES AWARDED TO INDIAN SIKHS CALLED "RAGHEADS" BY TERMINAL MANAGER, REDUCED ON APPEAL
LESSON: It is essential today that employers instruct employees on the severe consequences that can result from behavior that is deemed to be discriminatory, or violate the Civil Rights laws. A Company can be insulated from damages in civil rights suits if it installs an internal complaint system that adequately responds to complaints of discrimination. Finally, if a vendor (or employee) is terminated, the Company should "paper" the decision, fully explaining the bona fide business considerations supporting the decision. (Bains LLC v. ARCO Products Company)
Please address any comments or questions to Mr. Bode at 202-862-4300 or email@example.com.
BACK TO ENERGY NEWS ARTICLES MAIN PAGE